Tuesday, February 16, 2021

UPDATE AMERICA: 2/16/21

 
"The Flag of Lincoln. It was considered a great honor to be chosen to carry the flag in battle. The Soldier was unarmed and knew they would most certainly die (as did most who fought), but understood that the fight, that their lives, was worth the cost (self-sacrifice). They believed in something greater than themselves. To them, the flag represented a symbol of freedom, of hope, of equality and prosperity. To disrespect the flag, to kneel, is to disrespect those people who fought and died to provide each and every one of us the rights we are afforded today. Old Glory knows not what color skin carries her - only that for which it stands - one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and JUSTICE FOR ALL. TO FREE FROM OPPRESSION."
 


meanwhile: there's no end to this sht
HAPPENING THIS FRIDAY GTFIH L (ID: qjJiBUow) 02/16/21(Tue)10:12:30 No.308341332 ▶TRUMP TO BE VINDICATED IN A FEW DAYS

Trump v Pennsylvania, docket number 20-845: >https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html

Judge Roberts may be corrupt, but judge Alito could force them to decide on open trials this Friday. Alito personally tried to stop fraud in Pennsylvania, after it became known that the transparency of the vote counting process had been blocked in one or more Philadelphian voting districts. Alito ordered the state of Pennsylvania to separate the mail-in ballots received after election day midnight, from the other mail-in ballots. In violation of this the state secretary of Pennsylvania directly went against Alito's orders to separate the mail-in ballots received on or before election day midnight (the final deadline for votes in every single civilized country on this fucking planet) from the mail-in ballots received AFTER election day has ended. This is a state with no voter ID btw. And that secretary of state's name is Kathy Boockvar and she is the defendant in Trump's February 19th case. She resigned after SCOTUS january 22nd conference (what did Roberts tell her?), and a narrative spinner article from Time came out around that time instantly after.

Another docketed case with high potential is Lin Wood v Georgia, docket number 20-799: >https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-799.html

Wood posted this a few days ago on his Telegram channel (https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth):

>A lie repeated a thousand times is still a lie. The propagandists work from the idea that if you hear a lie enough times, you will believe it is true.

>Anyone in the media who publishes the idea that Joey “Bribes” Biden won the November 3, 2020 election is either a liar or a propagandist. Or does that distinction really exist? A propagandist is by definition a liar.

Why is Lin Wood so confident? What does he know?

Posted by at